Labour’s Shift on Human Rights Law: A Strategic Necessity
The recent arrival of David Lammy and Richard Hermer in Strasbourg to advocate for new constraints on human rights law marks a significant turning point in UK politics. Just a year ago, such a collaboration would have seemed unimaginable. Yet, as one ally aptly quoted from The Leopard, “If we want things to stay as they are, things will have to change.” This sentiment encapsulates the political climate today.
The Push for Change
It was Shabana Mahmood, now the Home Secretary, who championed the idea that Labour must engage in the reform of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) interpretation. Her unwavering stance stems from a belief that failing to address the perceived overreach of human rights law could lead to more drastic consequences, particularly if Labour loses the next election to a hard-right opposition.
This message of “reform or die” has resonated with a growing number of Labour MPs, including Lammy and Hermer, both of whom have previously expressed skepticism about this reform agenda. The evolution of their stance is noteworthy:
- Lammy: A veteran in the fight for racial justice.
- Hermer: One of the most respected human rights barristers of his generation.
Aligning with Controversial Allies
It may be jarring for many to witness the UK aligning with countries like Hungary and Italy, advocating for a narrower interpretation of terms like “inhuman and degrading treatment.” However, Lammy and Hermer’s presence in Strasbourg, alongside other center-left nations such as Norway and Ireland, reflects a shared belief that reform is essential for the ECHR’s survival.
Ministers are keen to position the UK as a pivotal voice in this discourse. Under the leadership of Keir Starmer, a former human rights lawyer himself, the notion of exiting the ECHR is off the table. Instead, the focus is on showcasing how national interests can be safeguarded while remaining committed to the ECHR.
The Evolving Political Landscape
With the Conservative Party now also advocating for withdrawal from the ECHR, the urgency of Labour’s position has intensified. Starmer acknowledges that there have been instances of the convention being interpreted too broadly, particularly at lower tribunal levels. Some of the exaggerated narratives in right-wing media—such as foreign judges preventing the deportation of criminals due to their children’s preferences—overshadow more serious concerns.
- Examples include child rapists being allowed to remain in the UK due to inadequate prison conditions in Brazil.
- Healthcare standards in other countries sometimes preventing deportations.
Ministers assert that their goal is not to obstruct genuine asylum seekers but to refine the legal interpretations that lead to such outcomes. They argue that it is not Strasbourg’s judgments causing the problems, but rather the domestic immigration tribunals’ interpretations of the convention.
A Call for Reform
The UK, along with 27 allies, is seeking a spring declaration from the ECHR to establish stricter guidelines for interpreting family life and degrading treatment. The hope is that these changes will lead to fewer court interventions preventing the deportation of dangerous individuals, thereby reducing ammunition for far-right rhetoric.
The Counterargument
However, many charities and campaigners contend that appeasing far-right concerns is not the solution; instead, they advocate for a more robust defense of human rights principles. There looms a significant risk for Starmer: if he does not vocalize this commitment to human rights, he may alienate progressive voters while failing to sway anti-immigration sentiment from the right.
In conclusion, while Labour’s approach seeks to navigate the treacherous waters of human rights law reform, the party must carefully balance the need for political expediency with a steadfast commitment to the principles of justice and human rights. The path forward will require astute navigation to avoid losing the support of core constituents.
For more details, please read the original news article here.

