American Eagle is a US-founded fashion brand that sells jeans, shrunken “baby” T-shirts and cropped sweatshirts to predominantly tween and teenage girls. On TikTok, users gush about their clothes in outfit-of-the-day posts or shopping hauls. This week, however, the brand found itself facing backlash over its new campaign, starring the 27-year-old White Lotus and Euphoria actor Sydney Sweeney, in which critics are alleging American Eagle uses the language of eugenics to try to sell denim.
The campaign depicts Sweeney in a denim shirt and baggy jeans provocatively posing as a male voice says: “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans.” In one now-viral clip, Sweeney is filmed pasting a campaign poster on to a billboard. The poster’s text reads “Sydney Sweeney has great genes jeans”. In another video that has since been removed from American Eagle’s social media channels, Sweeney, who has blond hair and blue eyes, says: “Genes are passed down from parents to offspring, often determining traits like hair colour, personality, and even eye colour. My jeans are blue.”
Critics were quick to point out the implications of the advert’s wordplay. In one video that has had more than 3m views, a TikTok user compared it to “fascist propaganda,” adding: “a blonde haired, blue-eyed white woman is talking about her good genes, like, that is Nazi propaganda”. On the brand’s own channels, users are battling it out in the comments section. “It’s giving ‘Subtle 1930’s Germany’,” reads one. Another person posted: “The woke crowd needs to leave the room.” Even the US senator Ted Cruz has weighed in. Reposting a news story on X, he commented: “Wow. Now the crazy Left has come out against beautiful women. I’m sure that will poll well …”
According to Sophie Gilbert, a staff writer at the Atlantic and author of the book Girl on Girl which explores how pop culture is shaped by misogyny: “The slogan ‘Sydney Sweeney has good jeans’ obviously winks at the obsession with eugenics that’s so prevalent among the modern right.” Dr Sarah Cefai, a senior lecturer in gender and cultural studies at Goldsmiths, University of London, agrees. “Honestly, what were they thinking, that a white supremacist fantasy has permission to be aired so conspicuously?”
Aria Halliday, an associate professor in gender and women’s studies, African American and Africana studies and author of Buy Black: How Black Women Transformed US Pop Culture, isn’t surprised by the ad. In recent years, she says, “we have seen an influx of media reasserting the beauty of thin, white, blond, and blue-eyed people,” with many brands “invested in re-presenting the wholesomeness and sanctity of conservative white values.”
Critics have also zeroed in on the campaign’s focus on Sweeney’s body. In one clip the camera zooms in on the actor’s breasts – lingering in a way that Gilbert sees as “leering and unapologetic” – as Sweeney says: “My body’s composition is determined by my jeans.” The camera then cuts back to Sweeney’s face as she shouts: “Hey, eyes up here!” For Cefai, “its sexualisation of the viewer via its voyeurism exposes western sexism as a racialised fantasy of whiteness”. American Eagle were approached for comment by the Guardian but did not respond.
Fashion campaigns are notorious for purposefully sparking controversy, but the denim genre is a particularly seedy seam. In a 1980s Calvin Klein campaign, a 15-year-old Brooke Shields mused: “You know what gets between me and my Calvin’s? Nothing.” In 1995, another Calvin Klein ad featured models including Kate Moss being filmed in a basement as they undid the top button of their jeans and were asked: “Are you nervous?” It was criticised for alluding to child exploitation.
The American Eagle campaign comes at a time when the US is witnessing a cultural shift centering whiteness as well as more conservative gender roles, while the Maga movement has been linked with promoting a “soft eugenics” way of thinking. In 2025, there are new factors reinforcing old stereotypes. For Halliday, the rise of GLP-1 medications for weight loss and the record high unemployment of Black women in the US all feed into a wider cultural shift that is “about recentering whiteness as what America is and who Americans look like.”
Some fashion imagery is reflecting this wider regression. The blacklisted photographer Terry Richardson is shooting for magazines and brands again, while Dov Charney, whose role as CEO of American Apparel was terminated after allegations of sexual misconduct, is now making content for his new brand that resembles the heavily sexualised noughties style of his former brand’s advertising.
For American Eagle, a brand whose biggest demographic is 15- to 25-year-old females, to tailor their campaign to the male gaze seems retrograde, if not downright creepy. However, Jane Cunningham, co-author of Brandsplaining: Why Marketing is (Still) Sexist and How to Fix It, says many gen Z-ers who are fed a “hypersexualised visual diet” on social media may buy into the strategy. “Their attitude may be that they are ‘owning’ their sexuality by being overtly sexual in the way they present,” she says, pointing to the pop star Sabrina Carpenter as another example of someone who has also been accused of catering to the heterosexual male gaze.
after newsletter promotion
Halliday says that while “Black girls are rarely the target audience for ads,” some may still be curious to try the jeans: “the desire to be perceived as beautiful is hard to ignore,” she says.
Many gen Z-ers may not have experienced this genre of advertising, or “intentional provocation as branding strategy”, before, says Gilbert, for whom the campaign also reminds her of 90s Wonderbra ads with their “Hello Boys” slogan. But maybe they will come to see through it. They are “extremely savvy as consumers”, she points out. “They have the kind of language and expertise in terms of deconstructing media that I couldn’t have dreamed of utilising as a teen during the 1990s. And they know when someone is trying to play them, which seems to be happening here.
She adds: “It all feels like it was cooked up in a conference room to provoke maximum controversy and maximum outrage, and to get maximum attention.” And it seems – in the business sense at least – to be working. Since the campaign launched, American Eagle’s stock has shot up almost 18%.
To read the complete version of this newsletter – complete with this week’s trending topics in The Measure – subscribe to receive Fashion Statement in your inbox every Thursday.